The Algorithm of Relevance

Three in the morning and I am sitting here writing a blog
For what?
You might as well ask that question in the most ironic manner for if you are reading this, you have most certainly taken interest in some of the most boring topics of discussions a person can be upon. And i do commend your capability to do so for I myself don't bother to take a second look at what i post. That again clearly decides why i still haven't got a publisher, but then I am not that accurate at things, you see. I do not prefer to write upon a topic very objectively, i rather have a more liberal or broad sense of understanding that the rest of the world might cease to understand beyond a certain point of time and intelligence, their intelligence, beyond which the cannot understand what I am trying to say and so often pose me as, we what we say in the most mundane and make do terms "intelligent" , "smart" , "geeky" and words or phrases of a similar understanding.
But then, what use is it if the people of today have gone so absurd that they absolutely do not wish to proceed thinking about a topic if any discussion that branches out of it seems to deviate it even a bit. Why is it that we stop to understand, or rather prevent ourselves from understanding that, any idea, that branches out of another random idea is always linked to its precursory and hence will always have a significance. Minor in quite a few cases but then, we, on a broader scale, given the time and space we have, should not discard certain ideas calling them irrelevant or unrelated.
That is the first step towards innovation after all, isn't it .?
We all have the potential to create something great and amazing and of significant importance to the grand scheme, then why would we pit ourselves into a situation where we are handicapped by our own logic?
Now there is very little of what you might call a solution here.
You most certainly cant go running around pondering upon each little fragment of imagination trying to get something out of it.
Neither can you put a bar here to what is relevant and what is not and follow it everywhere. For that bar is most probable to cause over-or-under-estimation of a situation. The precise line of relevant and irrelevant been drawn is very rare.
And then, neither do we have an algorithm to follow that can allocate a bar to every situation.
All that we do is follow our instinct fused and disguised as logic.
So only a few people have their "logic" correct.
You see, we oft see people telling each other, your "logic" is wrong
or
something is 'wrong' with your "logic"
Now watch closely, if at all there is logic anywhere in the first place, it is nature's universal rule, the result can never go wrong.
There cannot be, 'by definition' , a situation of 'wrong logic'
So we are rather following our instincts and not the logic
The search of true logic is, and will most certainly remain a quest for quite some time to the rest of the human race.
And so will the decision for what is relevant and what is not
This is Parth Trivedi signning off
See you guys soon..:)